Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by niccolai at 2004-10-23 13:27:29

A vote for anyone in a liberal position is a personality flaw. Nader and Cobb would tell you that Kerry and Bush have almost the same views but aproach them differently, wich they say, is nonesence. Both want to reduce military budgets by fifty percent and put the money towards wildlife restoration, so that shows how well they are going to do...
Anywho, Kerry wants to issue illegal aliens driver's liscenses, that's going to lose him about 40,000 votes. He wants to stop production of military weaponry like the B1 and B2 stealth bombers, wich is another 60,000. He wants spannish taught in private schools (as well as other alterations to private school ciriculum) wich is going to cost him probably another 20,000. Those are only the issues he is consistant on, it's hard to point out his flaws because he changes his mind every god damn week and instead of ever offering any possotive alternatives, just slanders bush and hope it will get him votes from minorities and punk rockers who just turned 18 and as Greenday sais 'aren't a part of no redneck agenda'. Fucking democrats.

As far as bush, people will say he lied about the war in Iraq, what did he lie about? Nuclear weapons? even before he brought that up, 99% of the population was in favor of invading to root out terrorist organizations. The only arguement you could make against Bush invading Iraq is that there are more dangerous natins we should take out first since Iraq hasn't even been allowed to fly airplanes in thier own airspace in 30 years without the US's consent and can't take a piss without us seeing what color it is. But even so, I could argue it was the best move because of, you said it, oil. And don't confuse what I'm saying with the hippie 'we only invaded for oil' aproach. The oil is a big asset and after rooting out Iraq, will pay for it's reconstruction and it will also provide assets to form a strong nation in the heart of the middle east that will help us sort out it's neighboring countries, with the same success of isreal, after all, no one complained when a democrat created the borders for isreal.

As oddly as it seems, I'm going to haveto agree with Nick and tell everyone not to vote because statistically, when more people vote, democrats win, so I say sit on your ass, don't vote, and let the swing states pour in republican votes.

[default homepage]

[print][

11:07:43am Jun 08,2024
load time 0.00652 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]